Dana White's Zuffa Boxing looks set to reshape the boxing industry, but a closer look at their proposed contracts reveals potential financial strains for fighters.
CONTENT:
Zuffa Boxing's Savior Role Threatens Fighter Wages, Reveals Leaked Contracts
The recent developments in professional boxing have sparked controversy, with Zuffa Boxing – led by UFC President Dana White – vowing to save the sport. However, an in-depth analysis of the new contracts offered to fighters by Zuffa Boxing raises concerns about potential financial implications.
In the past, Saudi interests, led by Turki al-Sheikh, have been criticized for their dominance in boxing. Yet, even their harshest critics acknowledge that they have paid fighters substantial purses. Now, with TKO Group Holdings and Dana White at the helm of Zuffa Boxing, a new era for boxing in the United States is upon us (The Guardian, 2026).
However, this new deal does not appear as generous to fighters as the one offered by the Saudis. The contracts that many fighters are being asked to sign reveal a far less lucrative deal.
The Old Guard's Generosity
Turki al-Sheikh, the controversial Saudi businessman and media magnate, has been a significant player in professional boxing for several years. Critics have accused him of using the sport as a tool for political propaganda and whitewashing his country's human rights record. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that under his guidance, the Saudis have paid fighters substantial purses (The Guardian, 2025).
The New Deal: A New Approach Towards Fighters
With Zuffa Boxing taking the reins, the approach towards fighters has changed drastically. The new contracts being offered to fighters are far less generous than what they have been accustomed to. The details of these contracts, which have been leaked to the press, have raised eyebrows among boxing insiders.
Analyzing the Leaked Contracts
The leaked contracts reveal several troubling provisions. For instance, fighters will be required to pay a significant portion of their purses towards various fees, including but not limited to, "promotion fees," "travel expenses," and "training expenses." These fees could potentially eat up a substantial portion of a fighter's earnings.
Moreover, the contracts also include a non-disparagement clause, which prohibits fighters from speaking negatively about the promotion or its representatives. This clause could potentially limit a fighter's ability to negotiate better deals in the future.
The Future of Boxing: A Balancing Act
As Zuffa Boxing sets out to expand the footprint of its equity partners in the United States, it remains to be seen how the organization will balance the financial interests of its stakeholders with the needs and well-being of the fighters.
Congress is closely monitoring the situation, with some lawmakers expressing concerns about the potential monopolistic power that Zuffa Boxing may wield in the boxing industry. The fate of the sport hangs in the balance, as fighters, promoters, and regulatory bodies grapple with these complex issues.
Sources
The Guardian. (2026, January 28). Zuffa Boxing contract: Dana White reform. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jan/28/zuffa-boxing-contract-dana-white-reform
The Guardian. (2025, December 15). Saudi Arabia's Turki al-Sheikh: boxing's controversial kingmaker. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/dec/15/saudi-arabia-turki-al-sheikh-boxing-controversial-kingmaker