A human rights group has urged New York state and local officials to reconsider their investments in Israeli bonds, arguing that such purchases violate international law and fiduciary duties. The warning, issued by the human rights group Dawn, comes as a growing number of governments, universities, and other institutions around the world have divested from Israeli bonds in response to concerns over human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories.
In a letter sent to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney General Letitia James, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and state and city comptrollers Tom DiNapoli and Mark Levine, respectively, Dawn argued that investing public funds in Israeli bonds "violates legal obligations not to aid and abet Israeli crimes and their fiduciary duties to taxpayers." The group's executive director, Sarah Leah Whitson, said in a statement that such investments expose officials and beneficiaries alike to "substantial legal, ethical and financial risks."
According to the memo, which was obtained by The Guardian, Israeli bonds are issued by the Israeli government to finance its budget deficit. However, the memo argues that the Israeli government's actions in the occupied Palestinian territories, including the construction of settlements and the displacement of Palestinian families, violate international law and constitute crimes against humanity. By investing in Israeli bonds, the memo argues, New York officials would be providing financial support for these actions.
The memo also notes that such investments could expose New York officials to legal risks, as some countries and international organizations have called for boycotts of Israeli goods and services in response to the occupied Palestinian territories. For example, the European Union has labeled products originating from Israeli settlements as "settlement products," and some countries have prohibited their public institutions from investing in Israeli bonds.
The memo also argues that such investments could harm New York's reputation and relationships with other countries and communities. For example, the memo notes that many Palestinian Americans and their allies have called on New York officials to divest from Israeli bonds as a way of supporting Palestinian human rights.
Despite these concerns, some New York officials have defended their investments in Israeli bonds. For example, Tom DiNapoli, the New York State Comptroller, has argued that the state's pension fund is legally required to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets, including Israeli bonds. However, Dawn argues that such investments are not only inconsistent with international law, but also with the state's own values and commitments to human rights.
The debate over Israeli bonds is not new, but it has taken on renewed urgency in recent years, as concerns over human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories have grown. For example, in 2018, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on countries to "distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967." The resolution called on countries to "intensify efforts to promote and protect the human rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem."
The debate over Israeli bonds is complex and contentious, and it raises difficult ethical and legal questions. On the one hand, some argue that investing in Israeli bonds is a way of supporting the Israeli economy and promoting peace and stability in the region. On the other hand, others argue that such investments are a way of providing financial support for human rights violations and undermining the prospects for a just and lasting peace.
Ultimately, the decision to invest or divest from Israeli bonds is a matter of conscience and judgment for New York officials. However, Dawn's warning underscores the importance of considering the potential legal, ethical, and financial risks associated with such investments, and of engaging in a thoughtful and informed public debate about the role of public funds in promoting peace and human rights in the Middle East.
Sources:
"Human rights group warns New York officials against investing public funds in Israeli bonds," The Guardian, January 30, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/30/new-york-zohran-hochul-divest-israel-dawn-human-rights
"Israeli bonds," Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_bonds
"UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/19: Peaceful settlements," United Nations. https://unispal.un.org/document/119884
A human rights group has urged New York state and local officials to reconsider their investments in Israeli bonds, arguing that such purchases violate international law and fiduciary duties. The warning, issued by the human rights group Dawn, comes as a growing number of governments, universities, and other institutions around the world have divested from Israeli bonds in response to concerns over human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories.
In a letter sent to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney General Letitia James, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and state and city comptrollers Tom DiNapoli and Mark Levine, respectively, Dawn argued that investing public funds in Israeli bonds "violates legal obligations not to aid and abet Israeli crimes and their fiduciary duties to taxpayers." The group's executive director, Sarah Leah Whitson, said in a statement that such investments expose officials and beneficiaries alike to "substantial legal, ethical and financial risks."
According to the memo, which was obtained by The Guardian, Israeli bonds are issued by the Israeli government to finance its budget deficit. However, the memo argues that the Israeli government's actions in the occupied Palestinian territories, including the construction of settlements and the displacement of Palestinian families, violate international law and constitute crimes against humanity. By investing in Israeli bonds, the memo argues, New York officials would be providing financial support for these actions.
The memo also notes that such investments could expose New York officials to legal risks, as some countries and international organizations have called for boycotts of Israeli goods and services in response to the occupied Palestinian territories. For example, the European Union has labeled products originating from Israeli settlements as "settlement products," and some countries have prohibited their public institutions from investing in Israeli bonds.
The memo also argues that such investments could harm New York's reputation and relationships with other countries and communities. For example, the memo notes that many Palestinian Americans and their allies have called on New York officials to divest from Israeli bonds as a way of supporting Palestinian human rights.
Despite these concerns, some New York officials have defended their investments in Israeli bonds. For example, Tom DiNapoli, the New York State Comptroller, has argued that the state's pension fund is legally required to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets, including Israeli bonds. However, Dawn argues that such investments are not only inconsistent with international law, but also with the state's own values and commitments to human rights.
The debate over Israeli bonds is not new, but it has taken on renewed urgency in recent years, as concerns over human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories have grown. For example, in 2018, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on countries to "distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967." The resolution called on countries to "intensify efforts to promote and protect the human rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem."
The debate over Israeli bonds is complex and contentious, and it raises difficult ethical and legal questions. On the one hand, some argue that investing in Israeli bonds is a way of supporting the Israeli economy and promoting peace and stability in the region. On the other hand, others argue that such investments are a way of providing financial support for human rights violations and undermining the prospects for a just and lasting peace.
Ultimately, the decision to invest or divest from Israeli bonds is a matter of conscience and judgment for New York officials. However, Dawn's warning underscores the importance of considering the potential legal, ethical, and financial risks associated with such investments, and of engaging in a thoughtful and informed public debate about the role of public funds in promoting peace and human rights in the Middle East.
Sources:
"Human rights group warns New York officials against investing public funds in Israeli bonds," The Guardian, January 30, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/30/new-york-zohran-hochul-divest-israel-dawn-human-rights
"Israeli bonds," Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_bonds
"UN General Assembly Resolution ES-11/19: Peaceful settlements," United Nations. https://unispal.un.org/document/119884
