Tech Giants Make Waves: Microsoft Removes Controversial AI Guide, While China's Space Ambitions Take Off

AI-Synthesized from 2 sources
Bias Spectrum:
Limited

By Emergent Markets Desk

Friday, February 20, 2026

Tech Giants Make Waves: Microsoft Removes Controversial AI Guide, While China's Space Ambitions Take Off

Unsplash

In a week marked by significant developments in the tech world, Microsoft has removed a guide on training language models on pirated Harry Potter books, while a Chinese launch firm is making strides in its space ambitions, raising big money and planning another orbital-class rocket landing attempt.

The tech world is abuzz with news of Microsoft's decision to remove a guide on how to train large language models (LLMs) on pirated Harry Potter books. According to reports, the now-deleted data set was "mistakenly" marked public domain, sparking controversy among fans of the beloved book series. The move has raised eyebrows, with many questioning the ethics of using copyrighted material for AI training purposes.

Meanwhile, in the realm of space exploration, a Chinese launch firm is making waves with its ambitious plans. The company, which attempted China's first orbital-class rocket landing, has announced that it will soon try again. This development is significant, as it marks a major step forward for China's space program, which has been rapidly gaining momentum in recent years.

The Chinese launch firm's plans are not the only notable development in the space industry. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket is set to return to the Bahamas, a move that is expected to boost the island nation's space tourism industry. This development is a testament to the growing interest in space travel and exploration, with private companies like SpaceX leading the charge.

Microsoft's decision to remove the guide on training LLMs on pirated Harry Potter books has sparked a debate about the ethics of AI training. While the use of copyrighted material for AI training purposes is not uncommon, the fact that the data set was "mistakenly" marked public domain raises questions about the company's oversight and responsibility. As AI technology continues to advance, it is essential that companies like Microsoft prioritize transparency and accountability in their development processes.

In contrast, the Chinese launch firm's plans to attempt another orbital-class rocket landing demonstrate the country's commitment to space exploration. China's space program has made significant strides in recent years, with notable achievements including the landing of a rover on the far side of the moon. The country's ambitions in space are not limited to exploration, however, with plans to establish a permanent space station and even send humans to the moon in the near future.

The intersection of technology and space exploration is an exciting and rapidly evolving field, with significant implications for the future of humanity. As companies like Microsoft and SpaceX continue to push the boundaries of what is possible, it is essential that they prioritize responsibility, transparency, and accountability in their development processes.

In conclusion, this week's tech news has been marked by significant developments in the fields of AI and space exploration. Microsoft's decision to remove the guide on training LLMs on pirated Harry Potter books serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and transparency in AI development, while the Chinese launch firm's plans to attempt another orbital-class rocket landing demonstrate the country's commitment to space exploration. As the tech world continues to evolve, it will be exciting to see what the future holds for these and other companies pushing the boundaries of innovation.

AI-Synthesized Content

This article was synthesized by Fulqrum AI from 2 trusted sources, combining multiple perspectives into a comprehensive summary. All source references are listed below.

Fact-checked
Real-time synthesis
Bias-reduced

Source Perspective Analysis

Diversity:Limited
Far LeftLeftLean LeftCenterLean RightRightFar Right
Ars Technica
A
Ars Technica
Lean Left|Credibility: High
Ars Technica
A
Ars Technica
Lean Left|Credibility: High
Average Bias
Lean Left
Source Diversity
0%
Sources with Bias Data
2 / 2

About Bias Ratings: Source bias positions are based on aggregated data from AllSides, Ad Fontes Media, and MediaBiasFactCheck. Ratings reflect editorial tendencies, not the accuracy of individual articles. Credibility scores factor in fact-checking, correction rates, and transparency.

Emergent News aggregates and curates content from trusted sources to help you understand reality clearly.

Powered by Fulqrum , an AI-powered autonomous news platform.