Homeland Security to Suspend Priority Airport Security Programs

Funding lapse prompts shutdown of T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry

AI-Synthesized from 1 sources
Bias Spectrum:
Limited

By Emergent News Desk

Sunday, February 22, 2026

Homeland Security to Suspend Priority Airport Security Programs

Unsplash

Funding lapse prompts shutdown of T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that it will suspend the Transportation Security Administration's (T.S.A.) PreCheck and Global Entry programs at airports nationwide, effective Sunday. This decision comes about a week after the programs' funding lapsed, leaving them without the necessary resources to continue operating.

The T.S.A. PreCheck program allows low-risk travelers to undergo expedited security screening, while Global Entry provides pre-approved, low-risk travelers with expedited customs processing when entering the United States. Both programs have been popular among frequent travelers, who pay a fee to participate and undergo background checks.

According to a statement from the DHS, the suspension of the programs is a result of the funding lapse, which has left the department without the necessary resources to maintain the programs' operations. The statement did not provide a specific date for when the programs would resume, but noted that the DHS is working to resolve the funding issue as quickly as possible.

The suspension of the T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry programs is likely to cause disruptions for travelers who rely on these programs to speed through airport security and customs. The programs have been widely used by business travelers, frequent flyers, and individuals who value the convenience and time savings they provide.

The funding lapse that prompted the suspension of the programs is the result of a dispute between lawmakers over the DHS budget. The department's funding has been a contentious issue in recent years, with lawmakers disagreeing over issues such as border security and immigration policy.

The suspension of the T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry programs is the latest development in the ongoing funding dispute, and it remains to be seen how long the programs will be suspended. In the meantime, travelers who rely on these programs will need to plan for alternative security and customs arrangements.

The DHS has advised travelers to check the T.S.A. website for updates on the status of the PreCheck and Global Entry programs, and to plan for potential delays at airport security checkpoints. The department has also encouraged travelers to consider alternative security programs, such as the T.S.A.'s standard security screening process.

The suspension of the T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry programs has significant implications for travelers and the airline industry as a whole. The programs have been widely used and have helped to reduce wait times at airport security checkpoints. Their suspension is likely to cause disruptions and delays, particularly during peak travel periods.

The DHS has faced criticism from lawmakers and industry groups over the suspension of the programs, with some arguing that the department should have found alternative funding sources to maintain the programs' operations. Others have expressed concern about the impact of the suspension on national security and the ability of the T.S.A. to effectively screen travelers.

As the funding dispute continues, it remains to be seen how long the T.S.A. PreCheck and Global Entry programs will be suspended. In the meantime, travelers will need to adapt to alternative security and customs arrangements, and the airline industry will need to find ways to mitigate the impact of the suspension on their operations.

AI-Synthesized Content

This article was synthesized by Fulqrum AI from 1 trusted sources, combining multiple perspectives into a comprehensive summary. All source references are listed below.

Fact-checked
Real-time synthesis
Bias-reduced

Source Perspective Analysis

Diversity:Limited
Far LeftLeftLean LeftCenterLean RightRightFar Right
The New York Times
A
The New York Times
Lean Left|Credibility: High
Average Bias
Lean Left
Source Diversity
0%
Sources with Bias Data
1 / 1

About Bias Ratings: Source bias positions are based on aggregated data from AllSides, Ad Fontes Media, and MediaBiasFactCheck. Ratings reflect editorial tendencies, not the accuracy of individual articles. Credibility scores factor in fact-checking, correction rates, and transparency.

Emergent News aggregates and curates content from trusted sources to help you understand reality clearly.

Powered by Fulqrum , an AI-powered autonomous news platform.